Everything about Mcculloch V Maryland totally explained
McCulloch v. Maryland,, was a landmark decision by the
Supreme Court of the United States.
The state of
Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the
Second Bank of the United States by imposing a
tax on all
notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable, the U.S. Bank was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law is generally recognized as specifically targeting the U.S. Bank. The Court invoked the
necessary-and-proper clause in the
Constitution, which allowed the Federal government to pass laws not expressly provided for in the Constitution's list of express powers as long as those laws are in useful furtherance of the express powers.
This fundamental case established the following two principles:
- that the Constitution grants to Congress implied powers for implementing the Constitution's express powers, in order to create a functional national government, and
- that state action may not impede valid constitutional exercises of power by the Federal government.
The opinion was written by
Chief Justice John Marshall, a man whose many judicial opinions have shaped modern
constitutional law.
Background
As noted above, the State Legislature of
Maryland imposed a tax that required the
Second Bank of the United States to issue its notes on special stamped paper. The legislature also stated that the Second Bank needed to pay the state $15,000 annually or go out of business. James McCulloch, a
cashier at a branch of the bank refused to pay the tax and a suit was filed. The case was appealed to the Maryland Court of Appeals where the state of Maryland argued that "the
Constitution is silent on the subject of banks." It was Maryland's contention that because the Constitution
did not specifically state that the
Federal Government was authorized to charter a bank, the
Bank of the United States was
unconstitutional. The court upheld Maryland. The case was then appealed to the
Supreme Court.
Supreme Court decision
The court determined that Congress had the power to charter the bank. Chief Justice Marshall supported this conclusion with three main arguments.
1. The Court argued that the Constitution was a social contract created by the people via the
Constitutional Convention. The government proceeds from the people and binds the state sovereignties. Therefore, the federal government is supreme, based on the consent of the people. Marshall declares the federal government’s overarching supremacy in his statement:
2. Congress is bound to act under explicit or implied powers of the Constitution. Pragmatically, if all of the means for implementing the explicit powers were listed, then we wouldn't be able to understand or embrace the document; it wouldn't be possible to write them all down in a brief document. Although the term "bank" isn't included, there are express powers in the
Taxing and Spending Clause. Although not explicitly stated, Congress has the implied power to create the bank in order to implement the express powers.
3. Marshall supported the Court's opinion textually using the
Necessary-and-proper clause, which permits Congress to seek an objective that's within the enumerated powers as long as it's rationally related to the objective and not forbidden by the Constitution. Marshall rejected Maryland's narrow interpretation of the clause, because many of the enumerated powers would be useless. Marshall noted that the Necessary and Proper Clause is listed within the powers of Congress, not the limitations.
For those reasons, the word "necessary" doesn't refer to the only way of doing something, but rather applies to various procedures for implementing all constitutionally established powers. Marshall wrote:
(External Link
)Supremacy Clause dictates that State laws comply with the Constitution and succumb when there's a conflict. Taking as undeniable the fact that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy", the court concluded that the Maryland tax couldn't be levied against the government. If states were allowed to continue their acts, they'd destroy the institution created by federal government and oppose the principle of federal supremacy which originated in the text of the Constitution.
The Court held that Maryland violated the Constitution by taxing the bank, and therefore voided that tax. The opinion stated that Congress has implied powers that need to be related to the text of the Constitution, but need not be enumerated within the text. This case was an essential element in the formation of a balance between
federalism, federal power, and
states' powers.
Chief Justice Marshall also explained in this case that the Necessary and Proper Clause doesn't require that all federal laws be necessary and proper. Federal laws that are enacted directly pursuant to one of the express, enumerated powers need not comply with the Necessary and Proper Clause. As Marshall put it, this Clause "purport[s] to enlarge, not to diminish the powers vested in the government. It purports to be an additional power, not a restriction on those already granted."
Later history
McCulloch v. Maryland was cited in the first substantial constitutional case presented before the
High Court of Australia in
D'Emden v Pedder, which dealt with similar issues in the
Australian federation; the justices, while recognizing United States law as not binding on them, nevertheless determined that the
McCulloch decision provided the best guideline for the relationship between the Commonwealth federal government and the Australian States owing to strong similarities between the American and Australian federations, and specifically cited Marshall's opinion in deciding the case.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Mcculloch V Maryland'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://mcculloch_v__maryland.totallyexplained.com">McCulloch v. Maryland Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
